Period Tracker Privacy Laws by State

Alabama has a near-total abortion ban with no state consumer data privacy law, putting period tracker data at high risk of subpoena by prosecutors.

Alaska allows legal abortion access and has weak data protection laws. Period tracker data faces low subpoena risk given the state's legal landscape.

Arkansas has a near-total abortion ban and no state consumer data privacy law, creating high subpoena risk for period tracker users.

Arizona restricts abortion and has weak data privacy protections. Period tracker data faces moderate subpoena risk in the state.

California has constitutionally protected abortion access and the strongest data privacy laws in the US, giving period tracker users strong protections.

Colorado has constitutionally protected abortion access and one of the strongest health data privacy laws in the country, making it a low-risk state for period tracker users.

Connecticut has protected abortion access and a comprehensive data privacy law, giving period tracker users moderate to strong protections.

Florida restricts abortion to 6 weeks with weak data privacy protections. Period tracker users in Florida face high subpoena risk.

Georgia restricts abortion at 6 weeks and has no state data privacy law, creating high subpoena risk for period tracker users.

Delaware allows legal abortion access but lacks a strong state data privacy law. Period tracker data faces low subpoena risk given the state's legal stance on abortion.

Hawaii has constitutionally protected abortion access but lacks a comprehensive state data privacy law. Period tracker users face low subpoena risk overall.

Illinois has protected abortion access and a comprehensive data privacy law that covers health information. Period tracker users face low subpoena risk.

Idaho has a near-total abortion ban and no state data privacy law, creating high subpoena risk for period tracker users.

Indiana has a near-total abortion ban and no state consumer data privacy law, creating high subpoena risk for period tracker users.

Iowa restricts abortion and has no state consumer data privacy law, creating high subpoena risk for period tracker users.

Kentucky has a near-total abortion ban and no state consumer data privacy law, creating high subpoena risk for period tracker users.

Kansas provides legal abortion access but has only weak data privacy protections. Period tracker users face moderate subpoena risk.

Louisiana has a near-total abortion ban and no state consumer data privacy law, creating high subpoena risk for period tracker users.

Maine allows legal abortion access but lacks a comprehensive state data privacy law. Period tracker users face low subpoena risk overall.

Maryland has constitutionally protected abortion access but lacks a comprehensive state data privacy law. Period tracker users face low subpoena risk overall.

Michigan has constitutionally protected abortion access and moderate data privacy protections. Period tracker users face low subpoena risk.

Mississippi has a near-total abortion ban and no state consumer data privacy law, creating high subpoena risk for period tracker users.

Minnesota has constitutionally protected abortion access and moderate data privacy protections. Period tracker users face low subpoena risk.

Missouri has a near-total abortion ban and no state consumer data privacy law, creating high subpoena risk for period tracker users.

Montana restricts abortion and has moderate data privacy protections. Period tracker users face medium subpoena risk given ongoing legal battles over abortion access.