Period Tracker Privacy Laws by State

Massachusetts has protected abortion access and moderate data privacy protections with a strong shield law. Period tracker users face low subpoena risk.

Nebraska restricts abortion and has no state consumer data privacy law, creating high subpoena risk for period tracker users.

Nevada has protected abortion access and moderate data privacy protections. Period tracker users face low subpoena risk.

New Hampshire allows legal abortion access but has only weak state data privacy protections. Period tracker users face low subpoena risk overall.

New Jersey has protected abortion access but only weak state data privacy protections. Period tracker users face low subpoena risk overall.

New Mexico has protected abortion access but only weak state data privacy protections. Period tracker users face low subpoena risk overall.

North Carolina restricts abortion at 12 weeks and has weak state data privacy protections. Period tracker users face medium subpoena risk.

North Dakota has a near-total abortion ban and no state consumer data privacy law, creating high subpoena risk for period tracker users.

New York has abortion access protected by state law and moderate data privacy protections. Period tracker users face low subpoena risk.

Ohio has constitutionally protected abortion access following Issue 1 (2023) but has weak data privacy protections. Period tracker users face medium subpoena risk.

Oklahoma has a near-total abortion ban and no state consumer data privacy law, creating high subpoena risk for period tracker users.

Pennsylvania allows legal abortion access but has weak state data privacy protections. Period tracker users face medium subpoena risk given the state's legal complexity.

Rhode Island has protected abortion access but only weak state data privacy protections. Period tracker users face low subpoena risk overall.

Oregon has constitutionally protected abortion access and a comprehensive consumer privacy law. Period tracker users face low subpoena risk.

South Carolina restricts abortion at 6 weeks and has no state consumer data privacy law, creating high subpoena risk for period tracker users.

South Dakota has a near-total abortion ban and no state consumer data privacy law, creating high subpoena risk for period tracker users.

Texas has a near-total abortion ban with both criminal and civil enforcement mechanisms. Despite having a data privacy law, period tracker users face high subpoena risk.

Tennessee has a near-total abortion ban and no state consumer data privacy law, creating high subpoena risk for period tracker users.

Utah restricts abortion and has no state consumer data privacy law, creating medium subpoena risk for period tracker users.

Virginia allows legal abortion access and has moderate data privacy protections. Period tracker users face low subpoena risk.

Washington has constitutionally protected abortion access and one of the strongest health data privacy laws in the country. Period tracker users face low subpoena risk.

Wyoming has a near-total abortion ban and no state consumer data privacy law, creating high subpoena risk for period tracker users.

Vermont has constitutionally protected abortion access but only weak state data privacy protections. Period tracker users face low subpoena risk overall.

West Virginia has a near-total abortion ban and no state consumer data privacy law, creating high subpoena risk for period tracker users.

Wisconsin provides legal abortion access but has weak state data privacy protections. Period tracker users face medium subpoena risk given the state's political environment.