Glow vs Natural Cycles: Data Monetization vs FDA-Cleared Contraception
TLDR
Glow is a venture-backed fertility and cycle tracker with a documented history of data sharing. Natural Cycles is an FDA-cleared contraceptive app built around basal body temperature. They serve different purposes, but both require accounts and store data server-side.
| Feature | Glow | Natural Cycles | Floriva |
|---|---|---|---|
| FDA-cleared contraception | No | Yes (De Novo 2018) | No |
| Temperature tracking | Optional | Required | Yes |
| On-device storage | No | No | Yes |
| Account required | Yes | Yes | No |
| Data monetization history | Yes | No documented | No |
| Data can be subpoenaed | Yes | Yes | No |
| Price | Free / $59.99/yr | $12.99/mo | $2.99/mo |
Different tools, competing for the same user
Glow and Natural Cycles both appear in searches for “fertility tracking app,” but they are built for different things.
Glow is a cycle and wellness tracker with partner-sharing features and fertility calendars. Its revenue model involves data monetization; the company has documented relationships with insurers and third-party advertisers who receive health data. The free tier exists because the data has commercial value.
Natural Cycles is an FDA De Novo cleared contraceptive device that uses basal body temperature to determine fertile and non-fertile days. The $12.99/mo subscription funds the product. There is no advertising model and no documented enforcement actions for data misuse.
The comparison matters if you need general cycle tracking and are deciding whether the data risks of either app are worth it. For contraception, Natural Cycles has regulatory backing. Glow does not.
The data risk gap
Both apps require accounts. Both store data server-side. Neither offers on-device architecture.
Glow’s data risk differs from Natural Cycles’ in kind. Glow’s business involves monetizing health data commercially: insurers and advertisers receive information derived from your fertility and cycle logs. That is a form of data exposure separate from law enforcement access, and users have no mechanism to opt out.
Natural Cycles operates under GDPR and has no documented commercial data-sharing problems. Its server-side exposure is primarily legal: a court order can compel production of user data, the same risk that applies to all server-based period trackers.
In states with abortion restrictions, both apps create subpoenable records. A prosecutor with a valid court order can compel either company to produce user data. A company holding no data cannot produce any.
Temperature tracking: what Natural Cycles actually requires
Natural Cycles requires active daily participation. You measure basal body temperature every morning before getting out of bed, using a specific thermometer accurate to two decimal places. The algorithm uses that data to predict fertile windows.
Glow lets you log data intermittently. Natural Cycles does not. Natural Cycles’ effectiveness rates depend on consistent measurement. Missed readings reduce accuracy. The app is not appropriate for users who want hands-off tracking.
Floriva supports temperature tracking as an optional feature without requiring it. If you want to use basal body temperature as part of your cycle awareness without paying $12.99/mo and without server-side storage, Floriva supports that workflow.
Cost breakdown
Natural Cycles is $12.99/mo or $99.99/yr with no free tier. Glow has a free tier and a premium at $59.99/yr. Floriva is $2.99/mo. If FDA-cleared contraception is the use case, Natural Cycles’ price premium is specific to that regulatory value. If cycle tracking is the use case, Floriva costs less than either and stores nothing on a server.
Neither feels private enough?
Floriva stores everything on your device. No data sold, no account required.
Verdict
Glow and Natural Cycles are not direct competitors — one is a general wellness app with a monetization-heavy model, the other is a regulated medical device for contraception. If FDA-cleared contraception is the goal, Natural Cycles is the only app that qualifies. If cycle tracking without data monetization is the goal, neither app has on-device architecture. Floriva stores data on-device and cannot be subpoenaed.
PROS & CONS
Glow
Pros
- Free tier with solid cycle and fertility prediction
- Community and partner-sharing features
- Detailed logging for fertility treatment cycles
Cons
- Business model depends on health data monetization
- Data shared with insurers and third-party advertisers
- Server-based — data accessible via legal process
- No on-device architecture option
PROS & CONS
Natural Cycles
Pros
- FDA De Novo cleared for contraception
- Algorithm built on peer-reviewed fertility research
- No documented advertising data sharing
Cons
- Requires daily basal body temperature — passive tracking not possible
- Most expensive period tracker at $12.99/mo
- Server-based — data accessible via legal process
- Effectiveness depends on consistent measurement behavior
PROS & CONS
Floriva
Pros
- On-device storage — nothing on servers to subpoena
- No account required
- $2.99/mo for all users
- Temperature tracking available
Cons
- Not FDA-cleared for contraception
- Smaller feature set than established apps
Is Glow period tracker safe to use?
Glow has documented data-sharing practices with insurers and third parties as part of its business model. It stores data server-side, which means the data exists on Glow's servers and is accessible to law enforcement via subpoena. For users in states with abortion restrictions, this is a real risk. Glow's free model is subsidized by data monetization — health data is part of the revenue stream.
Is Natural Cycles FDA approved?
Natural Cycles received FDA De Novo clearance in 2018 as a contraceptive app — the first digital contraceptive to receive this designation in the US. De Novo clearance means the FDA reviewed clinical evidence and found the device safe and effective for its intended use. This is meaningful regulatory oversight, but the clearance is for contraceptive efficacy, not data privacy.
Does Natural Cycles sell data?
Natural Cycles has not faced FTC enforcement actions for data sharing the way Flo and Premom have. The company is Sweden-based and operates under GDPR, which restricts commercial data sharing more aggressively than US law. That said, Natural Cycles does require an account and stores data server-side — data exists on their servers and is theoretically accessible via court order.
Which is better for fertility tracking — Glow or Natural Cycles?
For FDA-cleared fertility awareness as a contraceptive method, Natural Cycles is the only option in this comparison. Its temperature-based algorithm has been clinically studied. Glow covers fertility calendars and ovulation prediction but is not regulated for contraceptive use. If privacy during fertility tracking matters, neither app has on-device architecture — Floriva does.
Frequently Asked Questions
Can I use Glow without sharing my data?
How effective is Natural Cycles as birth control?
What is the difference between Glow and Natural Cycles?
Ready to track with real privacy?
Start Your Free TrialRelated Comparisons
Glow App Alternative: Period Trackers That Don't Monetize Your Data
Glow is cloud-based with no documented on-device storage architecture. Here's what that means for your reproductive health data and what to use instead.
Natural Cycles Alternative: Period Tracking Without the Data Collection
Natural Cycles is FDA-cleared for contraception but requires extensive personal health data collection stored in the cloud. Here's what that means and what to use instead.
Natural Cycles Pricing: Is $12.99/mo Worth It?
Natural Cycles charges $12.99/mo or $99.99/yr, often with a thermometer bundle. We break down the full cost, what FDA clearance actually means, and how Floriva compares.
Best Private Period Tracker Apps in 2026
Ranked by privacy architecture — on-device storage, enforcement history, data model, and legal jurisdiction. Not just policy promises.
How Period Tracker Apps Predict Ovulation (And When They're Wrong)
Period tracker apps use calendar math, BBT, and sometimes LH data to predict ovulation. This guide explains each method, its accuracy, and where predictions commonly fail.
How Period Tracker Apps Collect and Use Your Data
Period tracker apps collect far more than cycle dates. This guide explains what data is collected, how it is used, and what the FTC enforcement actions against Flo and Premom revealed.